{"id":5511,"date":"2022-03-12T14:19:20","date_gmt":"2022-03-12T19:19:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/usda.attorney\/?page_id=5511"},"modified":"2023-04-10T17:10:54","modified_gmt":"2023-04-10T21:10:54","slug":"detroit-michigan-snap-violation-attorney","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/usda.attorney\/detroit-michigan-snap-violation-attorney\/","title":{"rendered":"Detroit Michigan SNAP Violation Attorney"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

\n\t\tSNAP Trafficking Defense: Beat the Odds\n\t<\/h1>\n

\n\t\tA Detroit, Michigan SNAP Retailer\n\t<\/h2>\n\t

There were 1,372 transactions listed in the EBT Analysis Charge Letter<\/a> that our client received in September of 2021.\u00a0 His store wasn’t huge, but it was big for the local area.\u00a0 He had about 3,000 square feet of retail space and storage, which made him bigger than the gas stations that surrounded his store, but still smaller than the distant supermarket.\u00a0 He didn’t have shopping carts, or shopping baskets.\u00a0 Our client was proud of the store, and his customers noticed the time and effort he invested into it.<\/p>\n

The USDA didn’t know much about his store though.\u00a0 They didn’t know that he had worked in the store since 1992, starting as just a clerk and saving to buy a piece of the store in 1997.\u00a0 A decade of hard work and saving later, our client bought the rest of the business in 2007.\u00a0 This store was his life’s work – his largest asset, and his family’s source of income.\u00a0 But the store was dependent on its Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) customers.\u00a0 This program used to be known as the Food Stamp Program, but the name changed when paper stamps were changed to Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) cards.<\/p>\n

Now, the USDA threatened to destroy his business by prohibiting him from accepting EBT because it didn’t like how his transactions appeared.<\/p>\n

\n\t\tDetails of the Charge Letter\n\t<\/h2>\n\t

Like most other EBT Analysis Charge Letters, this letter included the allegation that trafficking had occurred at the store during the January, 2021-June, 2021 “review period.”\u00a0 The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) didn’t allege that anyone had seen trafficking, or that someone claimed to see an EBT card misused, but rather that the transactions looked “suspicious.”\u00a0 There were two types of transactions the USDA cited as the basis for their claim that a violation occurred:<\/p>\n\t